-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
Description
Hi all. I hope everyone's well. An update on the paper (this issue closes #26).
The current draft is here, along with all the other files. We've incorporated some email comments from people who are not regularly on Github, which has been useful.
We're just waiting on a couple of things that lockdown interrupted:
-
Validation of the potency of the final four active compounds. They've been measured in duplicate in Dundee, but Dundee's (perfectly reasonable) policy is that published potencies should be measured in triplicate. Completing this should be quick after lockdown.
-
Confirmation that the more recent compounds in the paper share the same phenotype, i.e. that they are all still active in the ion regulation (PfATP4) assay. I'm 95% sure we've not scaffold hopped, but it's a loose end. This means shipping compounds to Adele and Kiaran in Canberra, and the temporary snafu is that the compounds are currently locked away in our shutdown UCL lab. We'll get them out as soon as we can.
For both these final measurements we have stocks of the compounds, which is a positive, and both relevant assays are up and running.
In the meantime we can get the paper ready to submit. This current draft is looking very nice (don't worry about the reference list - @edwintse is going to format that last thing). I need people to have a read and suggest any changes they'd like. Ultimately everyone will need to give the green light to submission, and that can be given now if you want. We're going to target Nature Comms since there's a lot of unusual work here.
The SI is also here, and it would help if people could also quickly verify their contribution to this document.
I also need people to check (at end of paper):
- Competing interests (we currently have none)
- Manuscript contributions (we've made a decent guess)
- Any additional funding that needs to be declared (specific to the project, rather than e.g. core company funding)
- Any co-authors we may have missed (this is super important, and it's easy to make a minor mistake when there are lots of authors)
Suggestions for referees for the paper would be very useful too.
@jonjoncardoso @spadavec @wvanhoorn @btatsis @BenedictIrwin @gcincilla @holeung @alintheopen @IamDavyG @sladem-tox @luiraym @murrayfold