use and() instead of intersect()

Author: oconnor663

crates/ty_python_semantic/src/types/typed_dict.rs

@@ -141,17 +141,16 @@ impl<'db> TypedDictType<'db> {
                             relation_visitor,
                             disjointness_visitor,
                         )
-                        .intersect(
-                            db,
+                        .and(db, || {
                             target_item_field.declared_ty.has_relation_to_impl(
                                 db,
                                 self_item_field.declared_ty,
                                 inferable,
                                 relation,
                                 relation_visitor,
                                 disjointness_visitor,
-                            ),
-                        )
+                            )
+                        })
                 }
             } else {
                 // `NotRequired[]` target fields
@@ -211,17 +210,16 @@ impl<'db> TypedDictType<'db> {
                                 relation_visitor,
                                 disjointness_visitor,
                             )
-                            .intersect(
-                                db,
+                            .and(db, || {
                                 target_item_field.declared_ty.has_relation_to_impl(
                                     db,
                                     self_item_field.declared_ty,
                                     inferable,
                                     relation,
                                     relation_visitor,
                                     disjointness_visitor,
-                                ),
-                            )
+                                )
+                            })
                     } else {
                         // Self is missing this not-required, mutable field. This isn't ok if self
                         // has read-only extra items, which all `TypedDict`s effectively do until