Replies: 1 comment
-
|
PS. This get's a little more complicated for singles, because, ideally, we'd want to be able to define a fallback breadcrumb path for each single section separately. Another reason maybe to ditch the "Singles" section grouping? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
When a source is disabled in the CP, entries in the corresponding section keep displaying the disabled source's title in the breadcrumb navigation, which is confusing for authors. This behaviour is correct from an implementation standpoint but not aligned with the user's mental model, which may only have access to those entries via a custom source.
Therefore I suggest that, when a source is disabled, we get the option to define a custom source to replace the "canonical" (disabled) source in the breadcrumb navigation.
Example:
Let's say we disable the
Newssection but we define a custom sourceArticlesunder whichNews itementries are displayed. The breadcrumbs forNews itementries will be as follows:Entries>News>News itemThe problem is that
Newsis hidden from the author so it makes no sense to her. Furthermore, it's (by necessity) disabled (not linked), so it doesn't take advantage of the "fancy breadcrumbs" dropdown functionality .It would be great if we could define that, since
Newsis disabled, we want to useArticlesin its place in the breadcrumbs nav, resulting in the following:Entries>Articles>News itemSeem's better to me from a UX perspective!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions