Skip to content

Conversation

@medyagh
Copy link
Member

@medyagh medyagh commented Nov 18, 2025

  • refactor installCertSymlinks to avoid shell command exploitation
  • refactor installCertSymlinks to improve safety by replacing shell command with direct command execution
  • refactor TestSetupCerts to improve clarity and update expected command outputs
  • refactor Copy function in SSHRunner to enhance command safety and clarity
  • refactor CopyFrom method in SSHRunner to use shellquote for command safety

Need to investigage if this Error Logs (in a passed test) in caused by this PR https://storage.googleapis.com/minikube-builds/logs/21923/42385/KVM_Linux_containerd.html#pass_TestISOImage%2feBPFSupport

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Nov 18, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: medyagh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 18, 2025
@medyagh medyagh changed the title hardensshrunner improve ssh runner copying cert files Nov 18, 2025
@medyagh
Copy link
Member Author

medyagh commented Nov 18, 2025

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. label Nov 18, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@medyagh: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
integration-kvm-containerd-linux-x86-64 0ff1edc link true /test integration-kvm-containerd-linux-x86-64
integration-kvm-crio-linux-x86-64 0ff1edc link true /test integration-kvm-crio-linux-x86-64
integration-docker-containerd-linux-x86-64 0ff1edc link true /test integration-docker-containerd-linux-x86-64
integration-none-docker-linux-x86-64 0ff1edc link true /test integration-none-docker-linux-x86-64
integration-docker-crio-linux-x86-64 0ff1edc link true /test integration-docker-crio-linux-x86-64

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@minikube-pr-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@minikube-pr-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@medyagh
Copy link
Member Author

medyagh commented Nov 19, 2025

/retest-this-please

1 similar comment
@medyagh
Copy link
Member Author

medyagh commented Nov 20, 2025

/retest-this-please

@minikube-pr-bot
Copy link

kvm2 driver with docker runtime

┌────────────────┬──────────┬────────────────────────┐
│    COMMAND     │ MINIKUBE │ MINIKUBE  ( PR 21923 ) │
├────────────────┼──────────┼────────────────────────┤
│ minikube start │ 41.8s    │ 40.9s                  │
│ enable ingress │ 15.6s    │ 15.9s                  │
└────────────────┴──────────┴────────────────────────┘

Times for minikube start: 42.8s 41.4s 41.7s 41.5s 41.6s
Times for minikube (PR 21923) start: 42.2s 40.5s 40.6s 40.9s 40.4s

Times for minikube ingress: 15.8s 15.2s 15.2s 15.8s 15.8s
Times for minikube (PR 21923) ingress: 15.8s 15.8s 16.2s 15.7s 15.7s

docker driver with docker runtime

┌────────────────┬──────────┬────────────────────────┐
│    COMMAND     │ MINIKUBE │ MINIKUBE  ( PR 21923 ) │
├────────────────┼──────────┼────────────────────────┤
│ minikube start │ 23.8s    │ 22.5s                  │
│ enable ingress │ 11.4s    │ 12.6s                  │
└────────────────┴──────────┴────────────────────────┘

Times for minikube ingress: 10.6s 12.6s 10.6s 10.6s 12.6s
Times for minikube (PR 21923) ingress: 12.6s 12.6s 12.6s 12.6s 12.7s

Times for minikube start: 22.0s 25.3s 25.2s 24.5s 21.9s
Times for minikube (PR 21923) start: 22.4s 21.9s 23.8s 21.6s 22.8s

docker driver with containerd runtime

┌────────────────┬──────────┬────────────────────────┐
│    COMMAND     │ MINIKUBE │ MINIKUBE  ( PR 21923 ) │
├────────────────┼──────────┼────────────────────────┤
│ minikube start │ 19.9s    │ 20.8s                  │
│ enable ingress │ 21.1s    │ 21.3s                  │
└────────────────┴──────────┴────────────────────────┘

Times for minikube start: 20.0s 19.0s 19.6s 19.4s 21.5s
Times for minikube (PR 21923) start: 21.4s 19.6s 21.9s 18.5s 22.8s

Times for minikube ingress: 21.1s 20.1s 21.1s 21.1s 22.1s
Times for minikube (PR 21923) ingress: 20.1s 21.1s 21.1s 21.1s 23.1s

@minikube-pr-bot
Copy link

Here are the number of top 10 failed tests in each environments with lowest flake rate.

Environment Test Name Flake Rate
Docker_Linux_containerd (4 failed) TestStartStop/group/old-k8s-version/serial/DeployApp(gopogh) 0.00% (chart)
Docker_Linux_containerd (4 failed) TestStartStop/group/no-preload/serial/DeployApp(gopogh) 0.00% (chart)
Docker_Linux_containerd (4 failed) TestStartStop/group/embed-certs/serial/DeployApp(gopogh) 0.00% (chart)
Docker_Linux_containerd (4 failed) TestStartStop/group/default-k8s-diff-port/serial/DeployApp(gopogh) 2.00% (chart)
Docker_Linux_containerd_arm64 (4 failed) TestStartStop/group/old-k8s-version/serial/DeployApp(gopogh) 0.00% (chart)
Docker_Linux_containerd_arm64 (4 failed) TestStartStop/group/no-preload/serial/DeployApp(gopogh) 0.00% (chart)
Docker_Linux_containerd_arm64 (4 failed) TestStartStop/group/embed-certs/serial/DeployApp(gopogh) 0.00% (chart)
Docker_Linux_containerd_arm64 (4 failed) TestStartStop/group/default-k8s-diff-port/serial/DeployApp(gopogh) 0.00% (chart)
KVM_Linux (9 failed) TestISOImage/PersistentMounts//data(gopogh) Unknown
KVM_Linux (9 failed) TestISOImage/PersistentMounts//var/lib/docker(gopogh) Unknown
KVM_Linux (9 failed) TestISOImage/PersistentMounts//var/lib/cni(gopogh) Unknown
KVM_Linux (9 failed) TestISOImage/PersistentMounts//var/lib/kubelet(gopogh) Unknown
KVM_Linux (9 failed) TestISOImage/PersistentMounts//var/lib/minikube(gopogh) Unknown
KVM_Linux (9 failed) TestISOImage/PersistentMounts//var/lib/toolbox(gopogh) Unknown
KVM_Linux (9 failed) TestISOImage/PersistentMounts//var/lib/boot2docker(gopogh) Unknown
KVM_Linux (9 failed) TestISOImage/VersionJSON(gopogh) Unknown
KVM_Linux (9 failed) TestISOImage/eBPFSupport(gopogh) Unknown

Besides the following environments also have failed tests:

To see the flake rates of all tests by environment, click here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants