@QuarkusComponentTest code coverage

[Tomnivore]

I have to start with the statement that the latest iteration of @QuarkusComponentTest is great! Really nice to get rid of the default constructor requirement.

However now it seems that it doesn't work with the Jacoco setup found in Quarkus Test With Coverage guide. Running tests with the annotation result in 0% coverage. I've tested it with Quarkus 3.29.0 and 3.29.2.

Has anyone noticed this, and fixed it? Or should I perhaps create a bug report?

[luca-bassoricci]

My collegue just noticed the same problem few minutes ago