Skip to content

Conversation

@sbgitZZ
Copy link
Owner

@sbgitZZ sbgitZZ commented Nov 14, 2025

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • package.json
⚠️ Warning
Failed to update the package-lock.json, please update manually before merging.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-JSYAML-13961110
  50  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Prototype Pollution

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-JSYAML-13961110
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @sbgitZZ, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request aims to bolster the project's security by upgrading the eslint dependency to its latest major version, 9.0.0. This update is crucial for mitigating a 'Prototype Pollution' vulnerability identified by Snyk. Reviewers should pay close attention to the package-lock.json file, as it needs to be manually updated to reflect the dependency changes and ensure consistent builds.

Highlights

  • Security Upgrade: This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, upgrades the eslint dependency from version 8.57.1 to 9.0.0.
  • Vulnerability Fix: The upgrade addresses a 'Prototype Pollution' vulnerability (SNYK-JS-JSYAML-13961110) with a medium severity score of 50.
  • Manual Intervention Required: The package-lock.json file was not automatically updated by Snyk and requires manual updating before this pull request can be merged.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request upgrades ESLint to version 9.0.0 to fix a security vulnerability. While this is a good security practice, this is a major version upgrade which introduces breaking changes and compatibility issues with other dependencies.

Specifically, @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin needs to be upgraded to be compatible with ESLint v9. I've left a detailed comment on the eslint version change.

Additionally, as noted in the PR description, the package-lock.json file was not updated. This is a critical step that needs to be done manually by running npm install and committing the updated lock file. After updating dependencies, please thoroughly test the linting process.

"builtin-modules": "^3.2.0",
"esbuild": "0.25.5",
"eslint": "^8.13.0",
"eslint": "^9.0.0",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

This major version upgrade of ESLint from v8 to v9 is likely to cause issues due to dependency conflicts and breaking changes.

  1. Peer Dependency Conflict: The currently used version of @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (^5.62.0) is not compatible with ESLint v9. You will need to upgrade this package. I'd recommend aligning it with your @typescript-eslint/parser version, for example, by upgrading it to ^8.33.0. You'll need to make this change manually in package.json.

  2. Update Lockfile: As the PR description warns, package-lock.json has not been updated. Please run npm install to regenerate the lock file and commit the updated file. This is crucial to ensure the correct dependency versions are used.

  3. Test for Breaking Changes: Major version updates often include breaking changes. After updating your dependencies, please thoroughly test your linting setup to ensure everything still works as expected.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants