Skip to content

Remove explicit use of Masked Array types #894

@Cadair

Description

@Cadair

Provide a general description of the issue or problem.

It's unclear to me why we explicitly use np.ma.masked_array and the dask equivalent. The problem with doing this is we are hard-coding the masked array handling in rebin to be numpy and dask only, excluding other things such as cupy.

We could just carry around two arrays, one for the data and one for the array? @DanRyanIrish

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions