-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 156
Open
Description
What is the issue with the URL Standard?
In the examples table in section 4, urn:isbn:9780307476463 is listed as a valid URL string. At first glance, it seems to be a absolute-URL string, but appears to fail because:
urnis a URL-scheme string that is not a special scheme, therefore must be followed by a relative-URL stringisbn:9780307476463does not start with/so it cannot be a scheme-relative-URL string or path-absolute-URL string- leaving the only the path-relative-scheme-less-URL string for relative-URL string , but
isbn:9780307476463fails the test of "does not start with: a URL-scheme string, followed by U+003A (:)"
How is the URN string a valid URL string if it doesn't have a valid relative-URL string?
The term "opaque path" is used in various places in the spec, but does is not used in the definition of valid URL string. One solution might be to better define "opaque path" and use it in the definition.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels