Analyze Project for Potential Improvements #183

fazedordecodigo · 2025-11-17T14:14:42Z

This pull request adds comprehensive documentation for validations of Brazilian documents (CPF and CNPJ) and format-based validations (such as email and credit card) to the project. The new docs provide detailed usage examples, algorithm explanations, regex patterns, and guidance for future contributions.

Brazilian Document Validations:

Added docs/validations/brazilian_docs.md with full documentation for CPF and CNPJ validation, including algorithm details, regex patterns, and examples of valid/invalid inputs. Also outlines future plans for other Brazilian documents like CEP, Título de Eleitor, PIS, and CNH.

Format Validations:

Added docs/validations/format.md documenting format validations for email, non-email, and credit card numbers, including regex patterns, Luhn algorithm explanation, and code examples. Also lists planned future format validations (URL, phone, CEP, passport, custom regex).

CI/Tooling:

Updated the linter workflow in .github/workflows/linters.yml to use uv sync --group linter for dependency installation, improving reproducibility and consistency for linting tools.## Descrição

Mudanças Propostas

Checklist de Revisão

Comentários Adicionais (opcional)

Issue Relacionada

Closes #<numero_da_issue>

- Cria documentação de validações numéricas (numeric.md) - Cria documentação de validações de formato (format.md) - Cria documentação de validações booleanas (boolean.md) - Cria documentação de documentos brasileiros (brazilian_docs.md) - Cria página sobre o Domain Notification Pattern (about.md) - Atualiza e corrige index de validações com links funcionais Resolve o gap entre a navegação do mkdocs.yml e os arquivos de documentação que estavam faltando. Todos os links agora funcionam corretamente. Issue relacionada: Melhoria de credibilidade e documentação do projeto

## Validações Brasileiras (CPF/CNPJ) - ✅ Implementa validação completa de CPF com dígitos verificadores - ✅ Implementa validação completa de CNPJ com dígitos verificadores - ✅ Rejeita números sequenciais e inválidos conhecidos - ✅ Suporta formatação (com pontos/hífen) e sem formatação - ✅ Adiciona testes completos para CPF e CNPJ ## Validações Numéricas Diretas - ✅ Cria NumericValidationContract para valores int/float - ✅ Implementa is_greater_than_number, is_lower_than_number - ✅ Implementa is_between_numbers, is_positive, is_negative - ✅ Implementa is_zero, is_not_zero - ✅ Adiciona testes completos ## Validações de URL - ✅ Cria URLValidationContract - ✅ Implementa is_url() e is_not_url() - ✅ Usa regex pattern existente ## Validações de DateTime - ✅ Cria DateTimeValidationContract - ✅ Implementa is_date_after, is_date_before, is_date_between - ✅ Implementa is_date_in_past, is_date_in_future, is_today - ✅ Suporta date e datetime ## CI/CD - ✅ Corrige workflow de linters (uv add → uv sync --group linter) - ✅ Evita modificação de arquivos durante CI ## Documentação - ✅ Atualiza docs/validations/brazilian_docs.md - ✅ Remove seções de "limitações" e "workarounds" - ✅ Adiciona exemplos completos de uso - ✅ Documenta algoritmos de validação Resolve: #29 (Validação de Documentos) Resolve: #28 (Validação de Números) Resolve: #33 (Validação de URL) Resolve: #27 (Validação de DateTime)

Copilot

Pull Request Overview

This pull request adds comprehensive validation capabilities and documentation to PyFlunt, significantly expanding the library's functionality with Brazilian document validation (CPF/CNPJ with full check digit verification), numeric validations, datetime validations, and URL validations.

Key changes:

Implemented complete CPF and CNPJ validation with check digit verification algorithms
Added numeric validation methods for direct int/float value comparisons (is_positive, is_negative, is_between_numbers, etc.)
Added datetime validation methods for date comparisons (is_date_after, is_date_before, is_date_in_past, etc.)
Added URL validation support with regex pattern matching
Created comprehensive documentation for all validation types
Updated CI/CD workflow to use uv dependency groups for linter installation

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 14 changed files in this pull request and generated 15 comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
`flunt/validations/brazilian_document_validation_contract.py`	Implements full CPF/CNPJ validation with check digit algorithms; has semantic issues with error message constants
`flunt/validations/numeric_validation_contract.py`	Adds numeric value validation methods (positive, negative, zero, comparisons); lacks test coverage
`flunt/validations/datetime_validation_contract.py`	Implements date/datetime comparison validations; contains logic bugs in date calculation and lacks test coverage
`flunt/validations/url_validation_contract.py`	Adds URL validation with regex patterns; lacks test coverage
`flunt/validations/contract.py`	Integrates all new validation contracts via multiple inheritance
`tests/validations/test_brazilian_document_validation_contract.py`	Comprehensive test suite for CPF/CNPJ validations
`tests/validations/test_numeric_validation_contract.py`	Comprehensive test suite for numeric validations
`docs/validations/brazilian_docs.md`	Documents CPF/CNPJ validation; contains incorrect error message documentation
`docs/validations/format.md`	Documents email and credit card validations; has documentation inconsistency
`docs/validations/numeric.md`	Misnamed file - documents collection size validation, not numeric value validation
`docs/validations/boolean.md`	Documents boolean validations with examples
`docs/validations/index.md`	Overview of all validations; contains outdated warnings and planned features list
`docs/about.md`	Comprehensive explanation of Domain Notification Pattern with DDD examples
`.github/workflows/linters.yml`	Updates to use uv dependency groups for linter installation

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

docs/validations/brazilian_docs.md

docs/validations/index.md

docs/validations/numeric.md

docs/validations/format.md

flunt/validations/datetime_validation_contract.py

flunt/validations/url_validation_contract.py

tests/validations/test_brazilian_document_validation_contract.py

tests/validations/test_numeric_validation_contract.py

Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>

Copilot

Pull Request Overview

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 14 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

docs/validations/index.md:370

The "Validações Planejadas" (Planned Validations) section is outdated. This PR implements several features that are still listed as planned:

⏳ DateTime: Already implemented in DateTimeValidationContract (lines 363)
⏳ Números: Already implemented in NumericValidationContract with methods like is_greater_than_number(), is_positive(), etc. (line 364)
⏳ CPF/CNPJ: Already implemented with full check digit validation in BrazilianDocumentValidationContract (line 365)
⏳ URL: Already implemented in URLValidationContract (line 366)

These should be:

Removed from the "planned" section
Added to the main "Categorias de Validação" section with proper documentation
The index should link to documentation for these new features

Note: The current "Numéricas" section (lines 65-84) incorrectly describes collection size validations instead of the new numeric value validations.

## Validações Planejadas

As seguintes validações estão planejadas para versões futuras:

- ⏳ **Regex**: Validação com regex customizado
- ⏳ **Objetos**: Validações de objetos complexos

Acompanhe o desenvolvimento no [GitHub](https://github.com/fazedordecodigo/PyFlunt/issues).

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

docs/validations/index.md

docs/validations/numeric.md

tests/validations/test_numeric_validation_contract.py

- Adiciona constantes para magic values (CPF_LENGTH, CNPJ_LENGTH, MAX_CHECKSUM_DIGIT) - Substitui datetime.now() e date.today() por função _get_today() com UTC timezone - Remove warnings PLR2004 (magic values) - Remove warnings DTZ005/DTZ011 (timezone aware datetimes) Todos os checks do Ruff agora passam com sucesso.

fazedordecodigo · 2025-11-17T17:11:36Z

@copilot open a new pull request to apply changes based on the comments in this thread

Copilot · 2025-11-17T17:11:45Z

@fazedordecodigo I've opened a new pull request, #184, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you.

fazedordecodigo · 2025-11-17T17:12:15Z

@copilot open a new pull request to apply changes based on the comments in this thread

Copilot · 2025-11-17T17:12:24Z

@fazedordecodigo I've opened a new pull request, #185, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>

- Adiciona constantes para valores mágicos (PLR2004) - Adiciona anotações ClassVar para atributos de classe (RUF012) - Substitui valores literais por constantes nomeadas nos testes - Remove todos os avisos do Ruff (16 erros corrigidos)

claude added 2 commits November 17, 2025 01:06

fazedordecodigo requested a review from Copilot November 17, 2025 14:14

fazedordecodigo self-assigned this Nov 17, 2025

fazedordecodigo added the 04 - Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Nov 17, 2025

fazedordecodigo added this to PyFlunt Nov 17, 2025

fazedordecodigo added the 01 - Enhancement New feature or request label Nov 17, 2025

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of fazedordecodigo November 17, 2025 14:15 View session

fazedordecodigo linked an issue Nov 17, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request

Add DocumentValitionContract #29

Open

Copilot finished reviewing on behalf of fazedordecodigo November 17, 2025 14:18

Copilot AI reviewed Nov 17, 2025

View reviewed changes

Update docs/validations/brazilian_docs.md

0c338b6

Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>

fazedordecodigo requested a review from Copilot November 17, 2025 14:52

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of fazedordecodigo November 17, 2025 14:53 View session

fazedordecodigo and others added 7 commits November 17, 2025 11:53

Update docs/validations/brazilian_docs.md

2226ad6

Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>

Update docs/validations/index.md

28de86f

Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>

Update docs/validations/format.md

1e342e5

Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>

Update docs/validations/index.md

d001f3e

Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>

Update tests/validations/test_brazilian_document_validation_contract.py

cdcd9de

Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>

Update tests/validations/test_numeric_validation_contract.py

54e7da6

Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>

Update tests/validations/test_numeric_validation_contract.py

657e07f

Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>

Copilot finished reviewing on behalf of fazedordecodigo November 17, 2025 14:57

Copilot AI reviewed Nov 17, 2025

View reviewed changes

docs/validations/index.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

docs/validations/index.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

docs/validations/numeric.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

tests/validations/test_numeric_validation_contract.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

Copilot AI mentioned this pull request Nov 17, 2025

Fix documentation inconsistencies in numeric validations #184

Draft

10 tasks

Copilot AI mentioned this pull request Nov 17, 2025

Fix documentation errors from PR #183 review comments #185

Draft

10 tasks

fazedordecodigo and others added 4 commits November 17, 2025 14:12

Update docs/validations/numeric.md

8be090b

Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>

Update docs/validations/index.md

07e0cc8

Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>

Update docs/validations/index.md

e71efe3

Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>

Uh oh!

Analyze Project for Potential Improvements #183

Are you sure you want to change the base?

Analyze Project for Potential Improvements #183

Uh oh!

Conversation

fazedordecodigo commented Nov 17, 2025

Mudanças Propostas

Checklist de Revisão

Comentários Adicionais (opcional)

Issue Relacionada

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull Request Overview

Reviewed Changes

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull Request Overview

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

fazedordecodigo commented Nov 17, 2025

Uh oh!

Copilot AI commented Nov 17, 2025

Uh oh!

fazedordecodigo commented Nov 17, 2025

Uh oh!

Copilot AI commented Nov 17, 2025

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants