Skip to content

Conversation

@mcint
Copy link
Contributor

@mcint mcint commented Sep 28, 2025

Dealing with requests like these, that scan for secrets and don't even present a knowledgable Host header, just the IP.

Response includes a clear reason, so it won't be mysterious to users.

Sep 27 15:27:21 m3.noisebridge.net caddy[2614044]: {"level":"info","ts":1759012041.31485,"logger":"http.log.access","msg":"handled request","request":{"remote_ip":"78.153.140.2
03","remote_port":"50716","client_ip":"78.153.140.203","proto":"HTTP/1.1","method":"GET","host":"216.252.162.220","uri":"/core/.env","headers":{"Accept":["*/*"],"User-Agent":["
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/38.0 Iceweasel/38.2.1"]}},"bytes_read":0,"user_id":"","duration":0.000039692,"size":0,"status":308,"resp_headers
":{"Server":["Caddy"],"Connection":["close"],"Location":["https://216.252.162.220/core/.env"],"Content-Type":[]}}

Copy link
Collaborator

@SuperQ SuperQ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interesting, very weird.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants