Make clear that digital sig section applies to jwt proof type too #346
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Already nominally the case given it's specified for the key binding jwt, but this makes it much clearer. closes #342
jogu
commented
Nov 19, 2025
c2bo
approved these changes
Nov 19, 2025
Member
c2bo
left a comment
c2bo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Agreed, that this already the case as an implicit requirement, but making it explicit will hopefully prevent confusion.
(document history is missing)
Vanderkast
approved these changes
Nov 20, 2025
charsleysa
approved these changes
Nov 20, 2025
fkj
reviewed
Nov 20, 2025
Co-authored-by: Frederik Krogsdal Jacobsen <[email protected]>
fkj
approved these changes
Nov 20, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Already nominally the case given it's specified for the key binding jwt, but this makes it much clearer.
closes #342