feat: add CorrT1METJet to NanoAOD schema and also add zero TrigObj mass

[ikrommyd]

Closes #1119

[ikrommyd]

@nsmith- Is it safe to add zero mass to the trigobj 4-vector to allow 4-vector math? Also CorrT1METJet now has a rawMass field in nano v15 (not in previous versions) which is definitely not zero: https://cms-xpog.docs.cern.ch/autoDoc/NanoAODv15/2024/doc_TTH-Hto2G_Par-M-125_TuneCP5_13p6TeV_amcatnloFXFX-pythia8_RunIII2024Summer24NanoAODv15-150X_mcRun3_2024_realistic_v2-v2.html#CorrT1METJet

Should we use that or zero out the mass?
It looks like this

In [16]: events.CorrT1METJet.rawMass.show()
[[2.09, -1.29e-06, 2.11],
 [0.965],
 [1.84],
 [2.74, 1.99, 1.28e-06, 1.78],
 [1.37e-06],
 [2.05, 0.932, 1.35],
 [2.47, 0.841, 0.898, -1.34e-05],
 [],
 [0.606],
 [2.82],
 ...,
 [3.24, 1.26e-06, 2.71, -6.98e-06],
 [2.56, 2.59, 1.99],
 [3.04, -1.01e-06],
 [1.89, 1.71, 1.85, 1.65, 2.15],
 [5.72e-06],
 [0.825, 1.79],
 [1.92, 2.26, 2.59],
 [2.17, 1.6],
 [-9.54e-07, 1.59, 1.72]]

[ikrommyd]

All these explicit stuff will be refactored in the form of class variable dictionaries similar to how we define all the other mixins. It will be done as part of closing #1474. I'm just now doing it in the same pattern as everything else.

[ikrommyd]

I don't understand this flaky failure that just showed up......

[ikrommyd]

Yeah this currently works but I had to add a big chunk of slightly modified code that I stole from awkward array in order to keep tracing functioning properly....This functionality should probably be in awkward and not here.